Employers want to hire former
athletes, athletes understand teamwork, leadership, and posses certain qualities
that non athletes might not. A survey of CEOs found that 100 percent of
employees would be more likely to hire a student athlete than a non-student
athlete. And 60% would hire a student athlete with a lower grade point average
than a non student athlete with an A average.” This according to a Forbes
article written by NCSA writer Kerry Brown of the NCSA (an athletic recruiting
website.
There is an increase in demand for big companies such as ESPN to hire many ex pros to be on their show. But is it right that they are getting them?
Should ex athletes have to go through some sort of training for a job like this? Is it fair they are getting these jobs? What do you think?
Brown,
Kerry. "How Athletics help you get ahead."NSCA. Forbes, 13
Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Nov 2013.
<http://www.ncsasports.org/blog/2013/10/03/athletics-story-forbes/>.
Schultz,
Brad. "Jockacracy Ethics." Journal of Sports Media.
Blogspot, n. d. Web. 17 Nov. 2013. <http://journalsportsmedia.blogspot.com/2007/08/jockocracy-ethics.html>.
Neus,
Elizabeth. "NFL Network intercepts Deion's attempt to write about
Vick." USA Today. N.p., 31 Jul 2007. Web. 17 Nov 2013.
<http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/falcons/2007-07-30-vick-deion_N.htm>.
Wyatt,
Ian. "Five Reasons Professional Athletes go Broke." Wyatt
Investment Research. N.p., 25 Mar 2013. Web. 18 Nov 2013.
<http://www.wyattresearch.com/article/five-reasons-professional-athletes-go-broke/>.
I think that it's true that athletes know a lot about sports, but I think they have too much bias. Also, they are un-trained. I think journalists who spend time on a sports beat can know just as much as an athlete and know how to report on it without a bias. They also know how to report the news ethically and to the standards required. I think it's best to use athletes as sources rather than reporters.
ReplyDelete